|
TENS Compare
AVAZZIA BEST™ vs. Conventional TENS
AVAZZIA BEST™ devices are FDA cleared as micro-current TENS devices for the symptomatic relief and management of chronic, intractable pain, and adjunctive treatment in the management of post surgical and post-traumatic pain.
The output signature of the Avazzia device is unique and is the basis for Avazzia superior performance substitute devices will not have this unique signature and therefore not perform the same as Avazzia.
Technical Comparison
| AVAZZIA BEST™ |
Conventional TENS |
| 21st Century Technology |
1970’s Technology |
High intensity, very low current, burst pulses
|
Low intensity, higher current, long duration pulses |
Voltage Range: 20-600 volts
|
Voltage Range: 0-40 volts |
Amperage Range: Microamps (10-6 Amps)
|
Amperage Range: Milliamps (10-3 Amps) |
Signals in the frequency range of 1Hz to 1500 Hz
|
Signals in the frequency range of 1Hz to 100 Hz
|
Damped asymmetrical biphasic sinusoidal waveform
|
Square waveform, mono-phasic or biphasic
symmetrical or asymmetrical |
Signaling always varies based upon changes in impedance of the tissue
|
Signaling is typically the same continuous pattern. |
| The AVAZZIA BEST device forms a somatic feedback loop between the device and the tissue |
No biofeedback |
Performance Comparison
| AVAZZIA BEST™ |
Conventional TENS |
| Somatic feedback loop prevents neurological habituation and accommodation, for more effective pain management |
Develops neurological habituation and accommodation, which severely limits effectiveness of pain management |
Effectiveness lasts several hours after treatment
|
Effectiveness often stops when treatment ends |
|
